nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.15 12-18
伦理治理与生态重构:教育评价数字化转型的范式
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13794/j.cnki.shjee.2026.0009
摘要:

教育评价数字化转型虽能借助AI、大数据实现评价智慧化与精准化,但也面临算法偏见、人的主体性消解及数字异化等伦理困境。本文提出“伦理治理+生态重构”的范式,通过整合伦理与生态要素、构建动态协同闭环、明确多元主体权责等措施,加以目标共契、策略互补、评估互馈三重机制形成治理合力。伦理治理维度从审查组织与准则建构、算法监管、数据隐私保障、数字鸿沟补偿四方面制定策略;生态重构维度围绕育人导向的精准转化与动态适配、人机协同与多元评价的深度融合、政府主导与多方协同治理的创新、营造持续创新的生态环境开展实践。

Abstract:

The digital transformation of educational evaluation leverages AI and big data to achieve intelligent and precise evaluation, yet it also faces ethical dilemmas such as algorithmic bias,the dissolution of human agency, and digital alienation. The transformation paradigm of “ethical governance + ecological reconstruction” integrates ethical and ecological elements, establishes a dynamic collaborative closed-loop system, and clarifies the rights and responsibilities of diverse stakeholders. It fosters governance synergy through three mechanisms, i. e., shared objectives,complementary strategies, and mutual evaluation feedback. The ethical governance dimension formulates strategies across four areas, i. e., organization review and standard setting, algorithmic oversight, data privacy safeguards, and digital divide mitigation. The ecological reconstruction dimension focuses on the precise transformation and dynamic adaptation of education-oriented approaches, the deep integration of human-machine collaboration and diversified evaluation, the innovation of government-led and multi-stakeholder collaborative governance, and the cultivation of an ecosystem that fosters continuous innovation.

参考文献

[1]吴龙凯,程浩,张珊,等.智能技术赋能教育评价的时代内涵、伦理困境及对策研究[J].电化教育研究,2023,44(9):19-25.

[2]周驰亮.数智技术赋能职业教育教学评价的价值表征、伦理挑战与应对策略[J].中国职业技术教育,2024(35):77-84.

[3]谢琦,余日季,蔡苏.GenAI技术在教育评价中的算法偏见:表现、成因与对策[J].现代教育技术,2025,35(1):53-62.

[4]杨欣.教育评价改革的算法追问[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2022,40(1):19-29.

[5]袁玉龙,马艳阳,庞茗月.人工智能时代教育评价主体性让渡的风险规避[J].现代教育技术,2023,33(5):34-40.

[6]周嘉腾,高巍,王沁颖.智能化教学评价的伦理反思与教育立场——基于比斯塔“教育之弱”的理解[J].电化教育研究,2024,45(7):25-31.

[7]曹渡帆,朱德全.新时代教育评价改革的数字正义何以可能[J].电化教育研究,2023,44(12):31-38.

[8]冯修猛,吴凡.数字化转型背景下教育评估高质量发展面临的挑战及其应对[J].教育发展研究,2023,43(22):31-36.

[9]鹿星南,高雪薇.人工智能赋能教育评价改革:发展态势、风险检视与消解对策[J].中国教育学刊,2023(2):48-54.

[10]张卓,刘冬冬.教育评价数字化转型的异化风险及其规避[J].当代教育科学,2024(2):61-69.

[11]UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence[S]. Paris:UNESCO,2021.

[12]吴龙凯,程浩,黄啟御,等.技术伦理视角下人机协同教育评价的运行机制与实践策略[J].中国电化教育,2025(1):8-16.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13794/j.cnki.shjee.2026.0009

中图分类号:G40-058.1

引用信息:

[1]李松.伦理治理与生态重构:教育评价数字化转型的范式[J].上海教育评估研究,2026,15(01):12-18.DOI:10.13794/j.cnki.shjee.2026.0009.

发布时间:

2026-02-28

出版时间:

2026-02-28

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文